I recently did a test with these two lnbs on various satellites for signal quality on a 1.1metre dish on a blade bm 7000s. It gave some interesting results. The inverto performed better on the middle strength sats such as 1w 7e 10e etc with about 4-5% signal gain. They both scanned around same number of channels on these but inverto found some feeds that the smart lnb did not so it holds itself as the feedhunters choice. But the area where the smart titanium outperformed was on the strongest sats like 13e 19e 28e. On 13e and 19e it had a gain of 3-4% siganal but the biggest difference was on 28e where the smart came in at 85% maximum on the blade with most tpxs where as the inverto hovered around 76% and then even lower on other other transponders. So it seems the inverto lnb is better for low to mid strength sats but the smart lnb is better for the high strength beam satellites.
↧